Expediting co-benefits of tailored municipal solid waste management strategies globally

Karak, T., Bhagat, R. M. & Bhattacharyya, P. Municipal solid waste generation, composition, and management: the world scenario. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 1509–1630 (2012).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

King, S. Recycling our way to sustainability. Nature 611, S7–S7 (2022).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Mamashli, Z. & Javadian, N. Sustainable design modifications municipal solid waste management network and better optimization for risk reduction analyses. J. Clean. Prod. 279, 123824 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Chaudhary, P. et al. Replacing the greater evil: can legalizing decentralized waste burning in improved devices reduce waste burning emissions for improved air quality? Environ. Pollut. 307, 119897 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Zhou, C., Jiang, D. & Zhao, Z. Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from the predisposal stage of municipal solid waste management. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 12234–12244 (2016).

Google Scholar 

Mohanty, S. S. et al. Tricks and tracks in waste management with a special focus on municipal landfill leachate: leads and obstacles. Sci. Total Environ. 859, 160377 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P. & Van Woerden, F. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050 (World Bank Publications, 2018).

Xin, F. & Wan, X. A sustainable solution to promote interest-based municipal solid waste management. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 10, 649 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Nguyen, X. C. et al. Development of machine learning-based models to forecast solid waste generation in residential areas: a case study from Vietnam. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 167, 105381 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Mishra, R., Singh, E., Kumar, A. & Kumar, S. in Soft Computing Techniques in Solid Waste and Wastewater Management (eds Karri, R. R. et al.) Ch. 17 (Elsevier, 2021).

Fu, H.-Z., Li, Z.-S. & Wang, R.-H. Estimating municipal solid waste generation by different activities and various resident groups in five provinces of China. Waste Manag. 41, 3–16 (2015).

Google Scholar 

Popp, A. et al. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 331–345 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Hoy, Z. X., Woon, K. S., Chin, W. C., Van Fan, Y. & Yoo, S. J. Curbing global solid waste emissions toward net-zero warming futures. Science 382, 797–800 (2023).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Gómez-Sanabria, A., Kiesewetter, G., Klimont, Z., Schoepp, W. & Haberl, H. Potential for future reductions of global GHG and air pollutants from circular MSW management systems. Nat. Commun. 13, 106 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Ayeleru, O. O., Fajimi, L. I., Oboirien, B. O. & Olubambi, P. A. Forecasting municipal solid waste quantity using artificial neural network and supported vector machine techniques: a case study of Johannesburg, South Africa. J. Clean. Prod. 289, 125671 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Zhang, C., Dong, H., Geng, Y., Liang, H. & Liu, X. Machine learning based prediction for China’s municipal solid waste under the shared socioeconomic pathways. J. Environ. Manag. 312, 114918 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Lu, M., Zhou, C., Wang, C., Jackson, R. B. & Kempes, C. P. Worldwide scaling of waste generation in urban systems. Nat. Cities. 1, 126–135 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Global Waste Management Outlook 2024: Beyond an Age of Waste – Turning Rubbish into a Resource (United Nations Environment Programme, 2024).

Kanter, D. R. et al. A framework for nitrogen futures in the shared socioeconomic pathways. Glob. Environ. Change 61, 102029 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Absar, S. M. & Preston, B. L. Extending the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for sub-national impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability studies. Glob. Environ. Change 33, 83–96 (2015).

Google Scholar 

Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Fitton, N. et al. The vulnerabilities of agricultural land and food production to future water scarcity. Glob. Environ. Change 58, 101944 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Kaufman, S. M., Krishnan, N. & Themelis, N. J. A screening life cycle metric to benchmark the environmental sustainability of MSW management systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 5949–5955 (2010).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Hoang, A. T. et al. Perspective review on municipal solid waste-to-energy route: characteristics, management strategy, and role in circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 359, 131897 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Malico, I., Nepomuceno Pereira, R., Gonçalves, A. C. & Sousa, A. M. O. Current status and future perspectives for energy production from solid biomass in the European industry. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 112, 960–977 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Ripa, M., Fiorentino, G., Giani, H., Clausen, A. & Ulgiati, S. Refuse recovered biomass fuel from municipal solid waste. A life cycle assessment. Appl. Energy 186, 211–225 (2017).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Salman, M. Y. & Hasar, H. Review on environmental aspects in smart city concept: water, waste, air pollution and transportation smart applications using IoT techniques. Sustain. Cities Soc. 94, 104567 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Anand, U. et al. Potential environmental and human health risks caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB), antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and emerging contaminants (ECs) from municipal solid waste (MSW) landfill. Antibiotics 10, 374 (2021).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Gómez-Sanabria, A. & Lindl, F. The crucial role of circular waste management systems in cutting waste leakage into aquatic environments. Nat. Commun. 15, 5443 (2024).

Google Scholar 

Song, J. et al. Reinforced urban waste management for resource, energy and environmental benefits: China’s regional potentials. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 178, 106083 (2022).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Liu, F. et al. Regionalized life-cycle monetization can support the transition to sustainable rural food waste management in China. Nat. Food 4, 797–809 (2023).

Google Scholar 

K.C., S. et al. Wittgenstein Center (WIC) population and human capital projections—2023. IIASA (2023).

Bui, T.-D., Tseng, J.-W., Tseng, M.-L. & Lim, M. K. Opportunities and challenges for solid waste reuse and recycling in emerging economies: a hybrid analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 174, 105968 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Ghinea, C. et al. Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using prognostic tools and regression analysis. J. Environ. Manag. 182, 80–93 (2016).

Google Scholar 

Powell, J. T., Townsend, T. G. & Zimmerman, J. B. Estimates of solid waste disposal rates and reduction targets for landfill gas emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 162–165 (2016).

Google Scholar 

Paulauskaite-Taraseviciene, A. et al. Forecasting municipal solid waste in Lithuania by incorporating socioeconomic and geographical factors. Waste Manag. 127, 44–51 (2022).

Google Scholar 

Shigetomi, Y., Ishigami, A., Long, Y. & Chapman, A. Curbing household food waste and associated climate change impacts in an ageing society. Nat. Commun. 15, 8806 (2024).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Liu, M. et al. Assessment and projection of environmental impacts of food waste treatment in China from life cycle perspectives. Sci. Total Environ. 807, 150751 (2022).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Ramaswami, A. et al. Carbon analytics for net-zero emissions sustainable cities. Nat. Sustain. 4, 460–463 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Yu, Z., Khan, S. A. R., Ponce, P., Zia-ul-haq, H. M. & Ponce, K. Exploring essential factors to improve waste-to-resource recovery: a roadmap towards sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 333, 131305 (2022).

Google Scholar 

André, H. & Ljunggren, M. Towards comprehensive assessment of mineral resource availability? Complementary roles of life cycle, life cycle sustainability and criticality assessments. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 167, 105396 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Dashti, A. et al. Review of higher heating value of municipal solid waste based on analysis and smart modelling. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 151, 111591 (2021).

Google Scholar 

Fan, Y. V. et al. Integrated regional waste management to minimise the environmental footprints in circular economy transition. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 168, 105292 (2021).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

D’Amato, D., Gaio, M. & Semenzin, E. A review of LCA assessments of forest-based bioeconomy products and processes under an ecosystem services perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 706, 135859 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Shah, G. M. et al. Composting of municipal solid waste by different methods improved the growth of vegetables and reduced the health risks of cadmium and lead. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 5463–5474 (2019).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Pujara, Y., Pathak, P., Sharma, A. & Govani, J. Review on Indian municipal solid waste management practices for reduction of environmental impacts to achieve sustainable development goals. J. Environ. Manag. 248, 109238 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Magazzino, C., Mele, M. & Schneider, N. The relationship between municipal solid waste and greenhouse gas emissions: evidence from Switzerland. Waste Manag. 113, 508–520 (2020).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Tran, H. et al. Impact of air pollution on cause-specific mortality in Korea: results from Bayesian model averaging and principle component regression approaches. Sci. Total Environ. 651, 373–382 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Huijbregts, M. A. J. et al. ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22, 138–147 (2017).

Google Scholar 

Rao, N. D., Sauer, P., Gidden, M. & Riahi, K. Income inequality projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). Futures 105, 27–39 (2019).

Google Scholar 

Podgorski, J. & Berg, M. Global threat of arsenic in groundwater. Science 368, 845–850 (2020).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Peng, Y. et al. Acetolysis of waste polyethylene terephthalate for upcycling and life-cycle assessment study. Nat. Commun. 14, 3249 (2023).

Google Scholar 

Hu, Y. et al. Food production in China requires intensified measures to be consistent with national and provincial environmental boundaries. Nat. Food 1, 572–582 (2020).

Google Scholar 

Cavalett, O. & Cherubini, F. Contribution of jet fuel from forest residues to multiple sustainable development goals. Nat. Sustain. 1, 799–807 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Yang, Q. et al. Prospective contributions of biomass pyrolysis to China’s 2050 carbon reduction and renewable energy goals. Nat. Commun. 12, 1698 (2021).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Huang, B. et al. Building material use and associated environmental impacts in China 2000–2015. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 14006–14014 (2018).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Liang, S. et al. Quantifying the urban food–energy–water nexus: the case of the Detroit metropolitan area. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 779–788 (2019).

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Joint Global Change Research Institute (JGCRI) GCAM: Global Change Analysis Model. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2024).

Heijungs, R. Probability, Statistics and Life Cycle Assessment: Guidance for Dealing with Uncertainty and Sensitivity (Springer, 2024).

Giles, M. B. Multilevel Monte Carlo methods. Acta Numer. 24, 259–328 (2015).

Google Scholar 

Ciroth, A., Muller, S., Weidema, B. & Lesage, P. Empirically based uncertainty factors for the pedigree matrix in ecoinvent. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21, 1338–1348 (2016).

Google Scholar 

Eurostat Waste statistics. European Commission (2024).

Municipal waste, generation and treatment. OECD (2024).

Ecoinvent Database (ecoinvent, accessed 22 May 2024); https://ecoinvent.org/

TianGong Data Platform (TianGong, accessed 22 May 2024); https://www.tiangong.earth/data

Cao, Q. Tailored-Municipal-Solid-Waste-Management-Globally: random forest–based forecasting (v.1.0.1). Zenodo (2025).

Cao, Q. Tailored-Municipal-Solid-Waste-Management-Globally: LCIA models (v.1.0.2). Zenodo (2025).